My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/28/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 03/28/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:46:06 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:22:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/28/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/28/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4~~,~,saNToy <br />CITY o~ PLEASANTON <br />~ ~'i . <br />.~ <br />`~'~~° Plonning Commission <br />xwav ~ <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, <br />Data March 28, 1972 <br />Time ; $ :00 P.M. <br />PIGCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />to be 10 X 15 X 6, which indicates <br />a very large ince machine, more <br />compatible with the ice house on <br />Angela and First Street. <br />Mr. Charles W. Crabb, the applicant, <br />was present and explained that this <br />ice machine would be a 24-hour self- <br />service vending. machine, landscaped <br />with rock around it to blend in with <br />the surrounding area. He further <br />indicated that Mr. Russell, the Shell <br />Service Station Dealer at the locatio <br />is very interested in adding this <br />operation to his business. <br />The size of the machine was in quest <br />and Mr. Crabb was asked if he could <br />provide a smaller one. He indicated <br />that the smallest 24-hour self servi <br />model would be about 5 X 10, which <br />was still a large model, a size the <br />Commission could not support. <br />Commissioner Hirst suggested that th <br />applicant and the'staff discuss the <br />matter further and see if another <br />arrangement could be worked out, <br />possibly with a smaller reach-in <br />model, which the applicant indicated <br />could be provided. <br />Commissioner Pereira entered a res- <br />olution to deny V-72-6 as submitted. <br />This was seconded by Chairman Garrig <br />and carried unanimously. <br />The applicant was informed of his rig t <br />to appeal this decision to the City <br />Council or to resubmit another type <br />of ice machine for review. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.