My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/25/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 04/25/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:46:02 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/25/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/25/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4,'$ ~ <br />AsAN~o CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ '~/ . ~ • • <br />.~ <br />`~~° Planning Commission <br />rrao t <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote ;April 25, 1972 <br />Time : 8:08 PM <br />PIQCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Mariani indicated that although they <br />had no firm commitment from any major tenant, <br />they were working on this and still felt that <br />they had the best site to offer. They also <br />believe that when Livingston & Blayney makes <br />their review, they should study the shopping <br />center site question and make a determinatioi <br />on this. The Commission felt that perhaps <br />this would entail additional cost. The <br />Chairman felt that this study should be under <br />taken by the applicant himself. <br />Mr. Mariani continued to emphasize that <br />the General Plan consultant should undertake <br />the task of determining the appropriate <br />site. <br />A Mr. Francis Crawford, resident of Pleasant< <br />Meadows felt that the question of a regional <br />shopping center was a vital one and perhaps <br />should be given to a study group under the <br />General Plan Review for consideration. <br />The Public Hearing was then closed. <br />Commissioner Pereira expressed the opinion <br />that no presentation had been made by Willow <br />West that evening and under the circumstance. <br />it was impossible to make an evaluation of <br />the situa tion. <br />Commissioner Hirst ask Mr. Mariani when the <br />City staff could expect a presentation from <br />him. The applicant replied that it would be <br />a minimum of 30 days. <br />Chairman Carrigan advised him that when he <br />makes his submittal, hopefully he would <br />include information on tenants, the develo <br />and something more concrete than what was <br />presented that evening. <br />A motion was passed that this item be <br />continued for 30 days in order that the <br />applicant can submit his material for his <br />hearing to be scheduled for June 27. If <br />no material is received in the office by <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.