My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/13/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 06/13/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:45:47 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/13/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/13/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4~$ASAN~oy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />i •.~ • <br />,~ <br />,M `p <br />~~~° Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Date June 13, 1972 <br />Time ; 8:35 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Discussion followed. <br />Mr. Lee Amaral, representing Frank <br />Auf der Maur, with five acres on the <br />north side of Vineyard Avenue, spoke <br />concerning this matter. At the time <br />that Mr. Auf der Maur purchased the <br />parcel, they relied on the recommenda- <br />tions made by Livingston & Blayney in <br />their first General Plan. They are <br />requesting that their parcels be ex- <br />cluded from the Study District; also <br />the majority of these lands have al- <br />ready been developed. At this stage, <br />they feel the City should consider <br />returning the designation to its pre- <br />vi ous RM-15 . <br />[r. John Corley, speaking for the <br />sola property located south of Vine- <br />ard, also spoke in opposition of the <br />taff's recommendation that these pro <br />erties be placed in the RM-4. Mr. <br />Orley stated that because of the <br />hape of the Isola property, it would <br />equire substantial changes from what <br />as previously been anticipated for <br />he area. The property to the west <br />f the one in question is zoned RM-25 <br />nd it has been his experience that <br />he Planning Commision, when consid- <br />ring plans for apartment houses and <br />esign review, has historically con- <br />idered the zoning designations of <br />djacent properties. Mr. Corley re- <br />ommended that the Commission continue <br />his property with its current zoning <br />f RM- 2 5 . <br />.rs. Joanne Brown, owner of the Wal- <br />ace/Plato application on Vineyard <br />nd Mavis, spoke and requested that <br />his matter be continued until she <br />an be adequately represented by <br />ouncel. She cited conflict of in- <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.