Laserfiche WebLink
4y$~sAN~oy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />%. <br />.~ <br />~~~° Plonning Commission <br />.x..o <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Data June 13, 1972 <br />Time ; 8 :35 P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />town area at this time are running <br />about to capacity. <br />Commissioner Pereira felt that this <br />area should be removed from the Study <br />District, subject to the same words <br />of caution to prospective developers, <br />as noted under the review for Study <br />Area B, those being that building <br />permits are not available and will <br />not become available until fiscal <br />year 1974-1975. <br />A resolution was then offered by Com- <br />missioner Pereira, seconded by Com- <br />missioner McLain to lift the Study <br />District designation from Area A and <br />return the previous zoning designation <br />of RM-15 to those parcels. <br />Study Area C encompasses the bulk of <br />the properties lying north of Vine- <br />yard Avenue, with only two parcels <br />lying to the south of Vineyard Avenue <br />with basic zonings of RM-1500 and <br />RM-2500. It was Secretary Castro's <br />feeling that the properties north of <br />Vineyard be placed in a P.U.D. Dis- <br />trict with a designation of RM-2500. <br />To the south, Mr. Castro recommended <br />a zoning designation of RM-4. It was <br />Mr. Castro's further recommendation <br />,that this matter should be reviewed <br />'by Livingston & Blayney and until such <br />'time as input can be obtained from <br />that organization, that Study Area C <br />continue in that designation. <br />Commissioner Pons wondered why the <br />properties south of Vineyard should <br />not also be placed in the P.U.D. <br />Chairman Carrigan made the suggestion <br />that perhaps the Study Area should be <br />left as such and referred to Living- <br />ston & Blayney for their consideratio <br />-6- <br />