My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/13/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 06/13/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:45:47 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/13/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/13/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
qv~' y <br />~sA"T° CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ •~~ <br />,~ <br />`~~*° Planning Commission <br />~MMSO ~ <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING, <br />Otte June 13 , 19 72 <br />Time ; 8:35 P.M. <br />PIaCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Sid Leon, owner of an auto parts <br />store at 410 Main Street, spoke in <br />opposition to this request. He indi- <br />cated that he had been told many time <br />by staff that a auto parts store woul <br />not be permitted in a C=N District, o <br />he would have moved into a shopping <br />center himself. <br />Mr. Louis Leon, also of 410 Main Stre~t, <br />spoke reiterating Sid's remarks. <br />Commissioner Pereira stated that the <br />City's commercial uses in relation <br />to commercial districts were reviewed <br />last year and he felt that the Ordin- <br />ance should be upheld. <br />Mr. Raphel continued to endorse the <br />request of Brook vale Properties. <br />It was the consensus of opinion that <br />the commercial uses as noted in the <br />Zoning Ordinance, being checked per- <br />iodically, are valid and should be <br />upheld. <br />ccordingly, a resolution was offered <br />nd passed, denying the request of <br />rook vale Properties to allow the <br />uto supply use in a C-N District. <br />TENTATIVE SUB- entative Tract Map #3102 - Oakhill <br />DIVISION MAP (Refile). <br />Tent. Tr. 3102, <br />(Refile), Approved he City Attorney advised the Commis- <br />Res. 1189 sion that copies of AB-1301 were sent <br />ut to Commission and Council members <br />to make them aware that this bill in- <br />volves environmental criteria to be <br />considered when reviewing approvals <br />f tentative tract maps. Since this <br />is a refile, the provisions of AB-130] <br />ould be applicable. <br />Resolution <br />Seconded: <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />-10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.