My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/08/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 08/08/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:45:22 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/8/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/08/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote : August 8, 1972 <br />Time ; 8:00 P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />shopping center and the department <br />store tenants, who will join in the <br />ownership of the development. <br />Mr. Fairfield then took the floor <br />again and spoke of the multiple <br />development. Major access for these <br />units will be off Interstate #680 <br />via a frontage road, but other access <br />will also be through the ring road <br />surrounding the center. The multi- <br />ples themselves, consisting of courts <br />lakes, private parks and public park <br />land, will be done as close to the <br />exhibit as the developer can accom- <br />modate it. He made reference to the <br />fact that he hoped the School Distric <br />could relocate their site and find <br />an alternate location in the multi- <br />ple area. Mr. Fairfield wished to <br />emphasize that the main agreement <br />they wished to have with the City <br />is that there is a viable regional <br />project and hopefully, the whole <br />proposal will be acceptable. <br />Mr. Fairfield explained that the <br />178.045 acres proposed for the re- <br />gional center is an increase from <br />the original acreage of approximatel <br />147 acres. <br />Mr. Pat Gunn, 7817 Flagstone Drive, <br />spoke next, representing the Stone- <br />ridge Homeowners Association. He <br />indicated that the homeowners <br />association had been consulted <br />regarding the Stoneson townhouse <br />project; however, in this instance, <br />they were not, and Mr. Gunn indicate <br />to the developers that the associati <br />would most certainly be interested <br />in meeting with the Stoneson people <br />to review this proposal. <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.