Laserfiche WebLink
4y~~sAN~oy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~~~ • <br />,~ <br />`~ ~~° Planning Commission <br />.~..o <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Date ; August 8, 1972 <br />Time : 8:00 P.M. <br />PIG CB; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />At this time, from the staff's point <br />of view, the commercial development <br />is in keeping with the trends of <br />modern day shopping. No objection <br />is expressed at this time to the <br />peripheral concept being suggested. <br />Regarding the multiples, the staff <br />does not necessarily have objections <br />The use is compatible with the <br />commercial development. <br />Regarding the Murray School District <br />proposed school site, information ha <br />been received that at the school mee <br />ing the night before, the Board took <br />action to condemn the twin K-6 and <br />7-8 school site within this proposed <br />rezoning. Based on this, the staff <br />would recommend to the Commission <br />that they recognize the rezoning re- <br />quest for the regional center and th <br />multiple district under a P.U.D., bu <br />at this time, that they not impose a <br />definite density level based on the <br />outcome of the actions taken by the <br />Murray School District. Until these <br />matters are resolved, it was <br />Mr. Castro's opinion, that the Com- <br />mission should remain flexible about <br />the density that this development <br />should carry. <br />The Public Hearing was then opened. <br />The applicants spoke first. Mr. Ted <br />Fairfield, Chief Engineer for <br />MacKay & Somps introduced the group. <br />Mr. Charles Clifford, Attorney, <br />Messrs. Joe Burkhardt and Bob Eynck <br />of Bayshore Properties, Dave Heldt o <br />Brown & Heldt, Architects, Messrs. <br />Don Stoneson, Art Schumacher and <br />George Detweiler of Stoneson Constru <br />tion Company. <br />-3- <br />