Laserfiche WebLink
q~$~s"N~°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~ ~~;. <br />`~~~° Planning Commission <br />verso s <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DCfi@ : October 17, 1972 <br />Time : 8:22 P.M. <br />PIGC@: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />housing development <br />ate income families, <br />standards. <br />iscussion followed. <br />for low and moder~ <br />to lower the Cit 's <br />Mrs. Mary Alice Peterson, member of <br />the Design Committee working on this <br />project spoke next. She indicated <br />that because they had to reserve <br />funding for some amenities for the <br />recreation buildings and open space <br />facilities, they felt it would com- <br />pensate for the lack of architectural <br />amenities. They are thinking of the <br />future tenants and their needs. <br />r. Alexander then gave his reasons <br />by they presented the plan as such <br />nd felt that he could work out the <br />etails with the staff in the way of <br />dding accoutrements. <br />ecretary Castro suggested that per- <br />aps if one social hall were removed, <br />he funding could be transferred to <br />he rest of the project. <br />Mr. Levy stated that HUD sets the rent <br />and general rate of income. From thi: <br />they take a subsidy which goes to makf <br />the mortgage payment. They then come <br />up with a debt service mortgage which <br />also is the replacement cost. HUD <br />completely controls the flow of dollar <br />by the rents which they set. <br />Commissioner McLain directed his com- <br />ments to the aesthetics of the project <br />Much discussion ensued on the appearar <br />of the project and its long-term effec <br />on the community should it be allowed <br />to be constructed without the archi- <br />tectural treatments needed. <br />ce <br />is <br />-24- <br />