Laserfiche WebLink
4v~AS"N~°~ CITY of PLEASANT4N <br />~~ ~~;. <br />,~ <br />`~ ~*° Planning Commission <br />~wwso ~ <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : October 17, 1972 <br />Time : 8 :22 P.M. <br />PIQCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />The two sections are tied in through <br />pathways meandering through the pro- <br />ject, and will, in addition to <br />Recreation building #l, contain tot <br />lots and considerable open space area; <br />amounting to approximately 54~ of the <br />entire project. In the family sectio: <br />the dominent open space adjacent to <br />the recreational building is 180 ft. <br />X 115 ft. in size. <br />Parking spaces to be provided will <br />number 151. <br />Mr. Alexander stressed that under 236 <br />funding, to qualify for the middle- <br />income housing, a family would not <br />,need to show requirement regarding <br />'amount of funds it has. Mr. Alexander <br />!also presented a listing of the renta. <br />they anticipate to charge to the futu: <br />(residents. <br />Commissioner McLain directed a questi <br />to Mr. Alexander regarding the senior <br />citizens units. For those units im- <br />mediately north of Vineyard Avenue, <br />would it be possible at any point for <br />a person to look over the fence into <br />the units themselves? Mr. Alexander <br />answered that there is a roof over- <br />hang plus, because of the grade at ~ <br />that point, the fence would be raised <br />to about 6 ft . <br />Mr. Alexander then directed his atten~ <br />tion to the conditions of approval. <br />'On Condition #2, referred by Police <br />and Fire, regarding removal of the <br />,post supporting the roof brow, on the <br />'upstairs models . He stated that the <br />ielderly people will only be housed in <br />(the one-story units. <br />-20- <br />