Laserfiche WebLink
"'""°d CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING, <br />Dote ; October 17, 1972 <br />Time ; 8:22 P.M. <br />Place; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />quote anyone. However, it is Frankli <br />feeling that the Commissioner had not <br />indicated that ~, new savings and loan <br />company could~ocate in the C.B.D. H <br />just did not ~elieve that statement <br />has ever been made. <br />t was Mr. Schwab's personal belief <br />hat given a limited length of time, <br />here would be new consideration for <br />n application for a savings and loan <br />nstitution in the downtown. <br />ommissioner McLain felt that since <br />he State Commissioner cannot grant a <br />ermit to Citizens because of undue <br />njury and suggesting that Citizens <br />ocating in the C.B.D, would cause <br />ndue injury to Franklin is tantamoun <br />o admitting that the only way Citize <br />an survive is to start another core <br />rea in a shopping center. He felt t <br />s the kinds of service Pleasanton <br />ants, but the real issue is who is <br />oing to decide where it goes, and ho <br />he City is designed. <br />ommissioner Carrigan had nothing <br />urther to add. <br />ommissioner Wood indicated that the <br />Hain point is need. If the Commissio <br />in charge of granting licenses does <br />Zot see a need, if this came up again <br />Ze would not allow it even in the <br />~,mador Center. Feels there is need, <br />Zowever, is it also a matter of con- <br />venience? <br />ommissioner Pereira indicated that <br />he policy position of the City, al- <br />hough discussed at the recent study <br />ession, again perhaps, has some <br />uestion as to how the Council actual <br />eant for said policy to be interpret <br />'s <br />is <br />r <br />-12- <br />