My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/14/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 11/14/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:44:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:01:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/14/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y~,~-sA~vToy C T Y f <br />I o PLEASANTON <br />.~; . <br />`~~~°°` Planning Commission <br />~MMtO i <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Data November 14, 1972 <br />Time : 8:05 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Joseph Madden, owner of property <br />at 3851 Vineyard Avenue which is in <br />close proximity to this proposed pro- <br />ject, wished to know how the sewer <br />line will be required to be construct d <br />in Vine Street and how it would affec <br />his parcel. Mr. Sooby of Public Work <br />drew on the board an illustration the <br />manner in which this phase of improve ent <br />will be handled. <br />ecretary Castro told the Commission <br />hat the conditions discussed at the <br />eeting of October 17, 1972, were <br />till applicable, for the completion <br />f staff records, although it is pos- <br />ible that some of them have already <br />een cleared up by the applicant. <br />he Public Hearing was then closed. <br />Commissioner McLain indicated he was <br />much more pleased with this revision. <br />His only concern was that he had re- <br />ceived phone calls generating the <br />feeling that the staff and Commission <br />were against this project. This is <br />not so, as the sole intent of the <br />Commission and staff is to produce <br />the best possible development for the <br />funding available. <br />he Chairman voiced a hope that this <br />roject will be a worthwhile one and <br />nswer some of the housing needs in <br />he community. His recommendation is <br />or approval. <br />resolution was then offered approvi <br />his application subject to all con- <br />itions as noted. This resolution <br />as approved. <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.