Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote : February 13, 1973 <br />Time : s:os P.M. <br />PIG C0; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Commissioner McLain stated that under a 250 <br />Growth Rate, planning can be nebulous re: <br />single family versus multiple units. Secret <br />Castro replied that reapportioning of growth <br />numbers can be made. He further stated tha~. <br />the City was just attempting to place 26% ~, <br />of the units in multiple development and thee,, <br />balance in single family, and found this very+ <br />difficult in the 250 Growth Category. i <br />Acting Chairman Pereira thanked the Parks an <br />Recreation Commission for being present that <br />evening. <br />It was his feeling that he needed more time <br />to review the information presented that <br />evening before he could make a recommendatio <br />He requested a written summary of what he <br />had heard presented by the Director of <br />,Community Development. <br />!Secretary Castro explained that although <br />some written material had been given to the <br />Commissioners just that evening, that basics <br />what is contained in that written material w <br />repeated orally by him, and all he needed <br />from the Commission at this point is a very <br />general "ballpark" figure to take back to <br />Livingston & Blayney, <br />Commissioner Garrigan indicated that he felt <br />250 would be too low. Previously, the City <br />had been utilizing 1,000. Perhaps the City <br />should try 500, or a graduated number. <br />Commissioner Wood had a question regarding <br />the statute of limitations and how it would <br />affect the approved final lots outstanding. ~! <br />Discussion followed. <br />Y <br />-15- <br />