Laserfiche WebLink
4y~,~,sANToy <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~~ <br />`~~~~° Planning Commission <br />~..o <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote April 17, 1973 <br />Time : s:o5 F'M: <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />REFERRALS FROM <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY <br />(as noted in the staff report) Mr. <br />Haines meant the area visually avail <br />able to all. He did not intend to m <br />that this would be anticipation of <br />revised lot lines. <br />This matter being clarified, a motion <br />was offered by Commissioner Carrigan, <br />seconded by Commissioner McLain and <br />carried, approving the revisions in <br />the elevations for Stoneridge Town- <br />houses per Exhibit A. <br />Secretary Castro confirmed that the <br />environmental impact statement for <br />the Sand and Gravel Permit appli- <br />cation of Santa Clara Sand and Gra- <br />vel Co. had been received and copies <br />were passed out to the Commissioners. <br />However, the hearing before the Coun- <br />ty is on April 23 and the Commission <br />did not have sufficient time that <br />evening to review the statement and <br />they would not meet again until the <br />day after the hearing before <br />Alameda County. <br />', It was decided that the Commission, <br />', if they had any suggestions or oppo- <br />sition, would contact the staff <br />before the 23rd and the staff, in <br />turn, would notify the County of <br />their,.feelings. <br />Negative Declaration for the Re con- Motion: <br />struction of the Santa Rita Road Seconded: <br />Bridge Crossing the Arroyo Mocho. Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />There were no problems with this Absent: <br />referral, and a motion was adopted Abstain: <br />accepting the recommendation of the <br />Negative Declaration filed by <br />Alameda County Flood Control Dis- <br />trict. <br />-2- <br />