Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MiN~lTQS ~4F REGULAR MEETING. <br />Date ; April 24, 1973 <br />Time : 8:00 P.M. <br />FIC~ce: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />t Conditions 2, 3, 12. <br />VARIANCE AND <br />ZONING PERMIT <br />V-73-14 & Z-73-16, <br />Cont, for 90 days. <br />evise - Conditions (4) to add that <br />he tree in the parking lot be re- <br />ained by the developer - (9) That <br />comprehensive signing program for <br />11 the tenants shall be submitted by <br />he applicant and shall be subject to <br />he approval of the Design Review Boa <br />dd - Condition No. 20 - that the <br />pplicant agrees not to protest the <br />ormation of a parking district for <br />he downtown area, when and if one is <br />ormed. <br />resolution was then offered by <br />mmissioner Pereira, seconded by <br />mmissioner Carrigan and carried, <br />proving this application subject <br />the conditions in the staff report <br />d revisions and addition as noted. <br />dna Dobbel - variance to allow the <br />onstruction of an eight-unit apart- <br />ent building with a two-vehicle <br />arport located on the rear property <br />fine - and - design review for a <br />roposed eight-unit apartment build- <br />ng to be located on the southwest <br />orner of Tawny Drive and Norton Way- <br />oning for the property is RM-1500. <br />he design review phase was discussed <br />first. Senior Planner Harris explainE <br />he staff report. The design of the <br />uilding is similar to those already <br />xisting on Norton Way. The archi- <br />ectural treatment is adequate. The <br />taff's only objection was regarding <br />he carports. <br />he purpose for the recommendations <br />f denial by staff is that due to <br />he sewer problems confronting the <br />-3- <br />Motion: <br />Seconded: <br />Ayes <br />Noes: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />r <br />r <br />XI <br /> <br />