Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINU~'E8 ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />QQte : September 12, 1973 <br />T11'118: 8:02 P. M. <br />Place; Pleasanton Recreation Center <br />Chairman Pereira clarified that according to <br />State law, zoning must be substantially in <br />conformance with the General Plan. The re- <br />zoning and General Plan amendment procedures <br />may not be handled concurrently. Either the <br />land needs to be rezoned and then amended on <br />the Plan to meet conformity; or the opposite <br />procedure - amend the Plan and then rezone <br />the land - must be completed... In essence, i <br />the requested rezoning will not revise the <br />existing zoning by more than fifty percent, <br />it is left to the discretion of the Planning <br />Commission to decide if it is substantially <br />in conformance with the General Plan. <br />The Public Hearing was opened. <br />Mr. Jack Bras, representing Pico Investors, <br />was present. It was his interpretation that, <br />the required procedural steps plus infor- <br />mation to be submitted was a matter of dis- <br />cretion on the part of the Planning Director. <br />He indicated that of the 2.06 acres, they <br />would like .67 ac, zoned to C-N to allow for <br />a convenience market and allied retail uses. <br />There is sufficient population in the area <br />to support such a use. He cited some advan- <br />tages which would result from having some <br />retail there, such as reduced traffic on <br />Vineyard Avenue. <br />As pointed out in the staff report, the staf: <br />did not feel the allied retail facilities <br />attached to the convenience market could be <br />supported. The main concern here is that <br />no detrimental competition to the neighbor- <br />Ihood shopping center site should be allowed. <br />i,A further concern was the ingress/egress <br />Ito the proposed site on Concord Street. <br />(Discussion followed. <br />Mr. Bras further told the Commission that it <br />;is the applicant's intention to keep the <br />architecture compatible with the neighborhoc <br />and that he would be happy to present to the <br />r~ <br />\\\\ <br />,, <br />-4- <br />