My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/10/73
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
PC 10/10/73
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2013 4:52:44 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/10/1973
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/10/73
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Piarvning Commission <br />MINUT~$ ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGt4 j October 10, 1973 <br />Tims; 8:45 P.M. <br />Place] Pleasanton Justice Court <br />CONDITIONAL USE <br />PERMIT <br />UP-73-10, Approved, <br />Res. 1261 <br />!,A resolution was offered by Commis~- <br />sioner Pereira, seconded by Commis- <br />ioner Garrigan, and carried, con- <br />curring with the ordinance amendment <br />,..instituted by City Council on Octobe <br />~8, 1973, under their Ordinance No. <br />1712 - and specifically, as it pertai <br />Tito the lot split for the C & H <br />'Development Co. application, the <br />Planning Commission hereby waives <br />said requirement. <br />Commissioner Garrigan left the meet- <br />ing at this point - 8:55 P.M., due <br />to illness. <br />Ronald and Roanne Hobizal - appli- <br />cation for a conditional use permit <br />to operate a day care facility for <br />three children, at that property <br />commonly known as 4486 Bacon Court, <br />Pleasanton; zoning for the property <br />being R-1-6500 (Single Family) Dis- <br />trict. <br />The Commissioners determined from th <br />staff that the usual letters to <br />surrounding property owners were <br />mailed, and no response was received <br />by the department. <br />The Public Hearing was opened. <br />The applicant was not present. <br />There did not appear to be any pro- <br />blems with this application, and <br />since no one had any further ques- <br />tions, the Public Hearing was closed. <br />A resolution recommending approval <br />was entered and adopted, with staff <br />conditions noted in the report. <br />-3- <br />Res: <br />See: <br />Ayes <br />Noes: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />\\ <br />Q~\\\ <br />\\\\\ <br />»»»~ <br />i ~ <br />~ ~ i ~I <br />f <br />k X; <br />IX <br />XX X <br />X <br />j <br />r <br />I j <br />F <br />~ <br />I <br />I <br />I f. <br />~ <br />F <br />1 <br />i I ~ <br />~ ~ <br />' <br />~ I <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ <br />t <br /> <br />..._. _ ~ <br />L. <br />.L, h <br />__--~__,. _ , <br />, _ ~. <br />_~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.