My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/21/73
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
PC 11/21/73
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2013 4:53:19 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:38:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/21/1973
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/21/73
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Plaruning Commission <br />MINu~'~~ ~pF REGU~_AR MEETING. <br />Date t November 21 , 1973 <br />Time; 7:3o P.M. <br />PIQGej Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Federal agencies and the private <br />sector to seek other avenues on a <br />local level and take a more positive <br />posture. One method of opening the <br />door would be discussion on the <br />growth rate which will occur in the <br />next 12 months. <br />Commissioner McLain wanted to discus <br />the deletion of the 500-unit per yea <br />factor. He wondered about staff's <br />position in removing this from the <br />report. <br />Mr. Harris did not feel the deletion <br />of the 500-unit program was perti- <br />nent or necessary. He felt it <br />could be better discussed and worked <br />out in the short range plans which <br />would be an outgrowth of the economic <br />analysis next year when the map is <br />reviewed. And then, they could <br />analyze the entire city to see how <br />it should grow and at what rate. <br />The reason staff talked about holdinc <br />capacity is because that capacity <br />is reflected on the map at 75,000 <br />people. They do not talk about the <br />rate that the City would grow at to <br />reach that goal because the staff <br />does not feel that is a settled <br />issue at this time. <br />Commissioner Pons questioned the <br />75,000 population figure and how <br />this number was established. Senior <br />Planner Harris indicated that the <br />basic change was the virtual elimina- <br />tion of urban development in the <br />areas west of Foothill Road, southeas <br />of town, and the Ruby Hills. These <br />areas could accommodate several <br />thousand people. Basically, this <br />was the plan presented by John <br />Blayney on May 9, 1973. <br />-12- <br />~>;~a <br />r~~ <br />__L-.______..__.... __...._........T__..__..._..._ .__....... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.