Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4~'~ y <br />~BAN~° CITY of PLEASANTON <br />__ o <br />• <br />~MYfO <br />Planning <br />Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEET ING. <br /> Dote : August 14, 1974 <br /> Time : 8:13 P.M. <br /> PIOCB; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Considerable discussion ensued on t <br />two points to be resolved in that <br />report. <br />Reaffirmation of the role of the <br />Zoning Administrator was made by <br />Chairman Pereira. Some discussion <br />occurred between Commissioner Wood <br />and Chairman Pereira on the differ- <br />ences in the roles of the Zoning <br />Administrator as defined in Pleasan- <br />ton and Alameda County. <br />Chairman Pereira felt that the Board <br />of Adjustment has been an effective <br />and efficient body and could not <br />see where it should be dissolved and <br />that role assumed by the Board of <br />Appeals. Up to the present time, <br />that Board has never met because of <br />lack of work. <br />Secretary Harris explained that the <br />August 14, 1974 staff report is his <br />understanding of the consensus of <br />feeling from those present at the <br />joint Commission/Council meeting of <br />June 3, 1974. <br />The City Attorney indicated that it <br />is Council's position that since the <br />Board of Appeals has nothing to do, <br />and since that Board cannot be <br />dissolved due to building infraction <br />and possible resultant hearings on <br />them, Council feels that that Board <br />should take on the added role of <br />a zoning appeals board as well. <br />How this change would affect the wor <br />load of the Planning staff was dis- <br />cussed. <br />The Commission did not wish to say <br />they did not support the intent, but <br />if it is adding to staff work, or <br />-8= <br />