Laserfiche WebLink
4V$~-SANTOy <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~o <br />~- ~ Planning Commission <br />M ^O <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DCte ; October 15, 1974 <br />Time : 8 :14 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Approved . <br />Res. 1320. <br />report which defined the background <br />from which stemmed this request by <br />Mr. Tom Howarth, developer of com- <br />mercial lots on Commerce Circle and <br />Johnson Industrial Drive. <br />City Attorney Ken Scheidig stated <br />that he had made a study of this <br />situation and it was his opinion <br />that Condition No. 13 of Resolution <br />No. 955, pertaining to approval of <br />Tentative Tract 3163, was invalid, <br />since the ordinance could not be <br />arbitrarily amended with a tentative <br />map approval. <br />Consequently, the matter was dropped <br />and the condition, being invalid, <br />was to be stricken from Resolution <br />No. 955 adopted for approval of <br />Tentative Tract 3163. <br />Determination of use proposed by Resolution <br />Tenneco Chemicals, Division of Seconded• <br />• <br />Cal/Ink. Ayes: <br /> Noes: <br />Present at the review was attorney sent• <br />for the applicant, Marc Monheimer of stain <br />Steinhart, Goldberg, Feigenbaum & <br />Ladar of San Francisco. <br />Secretary Harris reviewed the staff <br />report, which recommended acceptance <br />of the operation. <br />A resolution was entered and adopted <br />unanimously making the determination <br />~ that the manuf acture and packaging o f <br />'water soluble and solvent dispersi- <br />!,ble paint colorant is the same as <br />'the manufacture of paint (where no <br />,boiling process is involved) and <br />'therefore, is a use which is similar <br />or compatible with the I-P concept, <br />sand a permitted use in the I-P <br />-7- <br />IX <br />~X <br />X <br />X <br />