PC 11/13/74 - Laserfiche WebLink

4V~~8A"~°y CITY of PLEASANTON .~, `~ ~~~° Planning Commission MMiO MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. DGtB : November 13, 1974 Time : 8:22 P.M. PICCe; Pleasanton Justice Court Mr. Rose explained that School Dis- tricts must justify their non-use of a school site or pay a penalty. Discussion followed on what options the District would have - should development take place in the future - to acquire school sites, and availability of other sites to serve the area in question. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner McLain was concerned over the predicament the City is in, in attempting to handle both "growth" and "no growth. " He felt that if the area did develop later, and since multiples are slated in the area, what will happen. Iie suggested possible Study District for the site. As far as the developer is concerned, right at this time he cannot build any way. The Chairman felt that if the land went into a Study District, the best that could happen would be a delay of a year and 30 days or so, and that would not be sufficient time to solve the problems in the City. Also, Mr. Harris stated that placing property in Study District would not preclude residential de- velopment according to the Code. Again, he wished to clarify that the zoning on the site is R-1-6500. City Attorney Scheidig also clarified that it would be difficult to place this property in Study District since the mechanism to do this is in the zoning itself. This could not apply in this case since Study Districts are only for study of property suggested for another zoning district, rather than a general plan amendment. -g __ __.. ___~ ..._..._r__ ...---.,._....._.._---..~...~._..__..__.___._._.~. ..._.. ... ..,...___...__T_.__-...._.... ,.. _....._._. _......._.... .._.......__.