My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/13/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 02/13/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:58:11 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:12:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/13/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~8~8d"r°~ CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~ Planning Commission <br />I MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGtB ; February 13 , 1975 <br />Time: 8:0o P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Don Sooby explained that the City is <br />running a little behind schedule on <br />these projects at this time. This <br />list is, however, very preliminary <br />and does include the park and re- <br />creations facilities. He would <br />suggest that the Commission review <br />and if there are any suggestions, to <br />contact him within the next three <br />weeks . <br />Acting Chairman McLain recommended <br />that the Chairman, Walt Wood, be <br />so informed of this. <br />TENTATIVE <br />SUBDIVISION MAPS <br />Tentative Tract <br />3256, <br />Denied, Res. No. <br />1332 <br />Tentative Tract Map 3256 - Longview, <br />This map was submitted to the City <br />for review on January 8, 1975, As <br />noted in the attachments submitted <br />with the staff report dated February <br />13, 1975, considerable correspon- <br />dence took place between City staff <br />and Dr. Longs attorney, Gilbert E. <br />Maines, who maintains offices in <br />Fremont, California. <br />Mr. Scheidig, City Attorney advised <br />the Planning Commission as follows: <br />According to Section 11552 of the <br />Business and Professions Code, once <br />a tentative map is submitted, a <br />City has 50 days in which to process <br />it, or it becomes automatically <br />approved, if no action is taken on <br />it. This code does not allow ade- <br />quate time for Environmental Review <br />of a project pursuant to guidelines <br />adopted under the aegis of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act <br />if an EIR is required, because a <br />project may have a significant effect <br />on the environment. If a project <br />required an EIR, then it would be <br />necessary to obtain an extension of <br />-10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.