My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/14/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 05/14/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:57:56 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:08:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/14/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/14/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~SA~~° <br />41'~ y CITY of PLEASANT~N <br />~ ~~~ • <br /> <br />~~° <br />.o ~ <br /> <br />Planning • • <br /> <br />Commission <br /> ~ <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEET ING. <br />DGte : May 14, 1975 <br />Time : 8:15 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />GENERAL PLAN <br />AMENDMENT <br />GP-75-2, Denied <br />Res. 1341 <br />Res. 1342, place <br />property in S <br />(Study) District <br />staff report, was entered and <br />adopted. <br />Spivak Properties - application for <br />an amendment to the Pleasanton Gen- <br />eral Plan from High Density Resi- <br />dential to Retail Business and <br />Offices for that approximately five <br />acre parcel of land located imme- <br />diately east of Hopy and Road and <br />north and east of the Pleasanton <br />First National Bank drive-in facility <br />The Public Hearing was opened. <br />Mr. Chris Beratlis was present, re- <br />presenting the applicant, who was <br />also present. <br />Commissioner Butler wished to explore <br />the position taken by staff and <br />applicant that the area would be un- <br />suited to any type of residential <br />development. Considerable discus- <br />sion followed. <br />Commissioner Garrigan expressed con- <br />cerns about the amount of general <br />plan amending the Commission has been <br />reviewing. Not too long ago, there <br />was a big study session; also, there <br />was a shopping center study made in <br />the last several years, which con- <br />sidered population versus amount of <br />neighborhood. centers. Discussion <br />also ensued on the rate of growth <br />in relation to need for additional <br />commercial facilities . <br />Commissioner Doherty also had some <br />of the same reservations as Com- <br />missioner Garrigan. Had concerns <br />about the revised General Plan, <br />tes . 1341 <br />to s <br />>econded: <br />eyes <br />foes <br />absent: <br />abstain: <br />Res. 1342 <br />Res. <br />Seconded: <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />X <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.