Laserfiche WebLink
',.""'° CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : October 8, 1975 <br />Time : 8:40 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />The City Attorney directed the Com- <br />missioner's attention to the environ- <br />mental effects and mitigation measure <br />which exist and also requested them <br />to review the sample .resolution at- <br />tached as Exhibit "B". <br />It was Commissioner Garrigan's opinion <br />that the EIR had been completed in <br />compliance with the adopted guideline <br />A resolution was offered by Commis- <br />sioner Shepherd, seconded by Chairman <br />Wood and unanimously carried, certi- <br />fying that the environmental impact <br />'report for Tentative Tract #3606, has~~ <br />,been complied with, per Exhibit "B". <br />Discussion then commenced on the <br />tentative map portion of the review. <br />Commissioner Carrigan could see no <br />reason for the Commission to accept <br />the tentative map. <br />City Attorney Scheidig stated that <br />under State law, a hearing is held <br />and the applicant is allowed to pre- <br />sent his position. Mr. Scheidig <br />further stated that acceptance of <br />this map by the Planning Commission <br />would constitute further violation <br />of the Regional Water Quality Control <br />Board's mandate . Denial of the map <br />at this time does not preclude devel- <br />oper returning at some future date, <br />when sewer capacity becomes available <br />to refile. The City Attorney advised <br />that he did not believe that the re- <br />commended action would violate the <br />Court's order. Consequently, denial <br />is recommended at this time . To that <br />end, he directed their attention to <br />a sample resolution recommending <br />denial . <br />-9- <br />........... <br />._r__.__.._ __. <br />