My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/30/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 10/30/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:55:10 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:46:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/30/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/30/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />SPECIAL <br />MINUTES ~OF k~t~2 MEETING. <br />DQtB October 30, 1975 <br />Time : 8 :05 P.M. <br />PIQCe; Veterans Hall <br />be in effect would be for 20 years, <br />with review every five years. <br />He then went to the addendum to the <br />EIR statement, pointing out that <br />the changes were a result of the <br />scaled down plan itself. <br />At this point, a Mr. Thurmon Caudill, <br />321 Augustine Street, contended that <br />his property still was not shown as <br />deleted from the project area. He <br />expressed dissatisfaction with this <br />situation. <br />Chairman Wood stated that altho-zgh <br />this hearing was not planned as a <br />public hearing, he would allow input <br />from citizens. <br />Next, Mr. Ben Fernandez, spoke on <br />behalf of the Chamber of Commerce, <br />and the special subcommittee formed <br />to study the redevelopment plan. He <br />indicated that they had worked with <br />CARD on this plan and their group <br />had studied it for a good month . On <br />behalf of the Chamber and its sub- <br />committee , Mr. Fernandez urged the <br />Planning Commission and the PRA to <br />approve this revised plan . <br />Mr. Ray Antonini, a resident of Ray <br />Street, had a question how owner <br />participation would affect a resi- <br />dential parcel also used as office. <br />Mr. Edgar replied that owner partici~ <br />pation agreements are purely volunta: <br />Mrs. Birdie Bianchi clarified that <br />this is a hearing before t11~ Plannin <br />Commission. She wished to know why <br />more publicity was not given on this <br />hearing. Mr. Scheidig replied that <br />under law, this is not a technical <br />.... 2....... __.__ .. ___ _. . __ <br />...._ .... _ . __-T-___._.. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.