My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/30/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 10/30/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:55:10 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:46:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/30/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/30/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />SPECIAL <br />MINUTES ~OF t~~~C~! MEETING. <br />DGtB : October 30, 1975 <br />Time : 8 :05 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Veterans Hall <br />requirement. The Commission is re- <br />quired to hold a hearing but it is <br />up to the discretion of the Chairman <br />of the Commission to open the hearin <br />to public comment if he wishes. <br />Commissioner Butler wished to know <br />whether some of the details of the <br />plan are still subject to change be- <br />tween now and the time that the City <br />Council meets on November 10? If <br />this is so , then Commission should <br />not be too concerned with the exact <br />form of some of the wording in the <br />plan. He specifically referred to <br />wording regarding creation of a Citi <br />zens Advisory Committee. Mr. Edgar <br />explained that implementation of suc <br />a committee would be accomplished by <br />resolution acted on by the Council. <br />Regarding powers of the Planning Com <br />mission, Mr. Edgar stated the plan <br />on page 20, under Items C and D, <br />spelled those out. <br />In conclusion, the Commissioners fel <br />this revised plan was acceptable, th <br />it was the result of many months of <br />work and that as a whole, the City <br />stands to benefit from it. <br />Commissioner Shepherd felt that the <br />plan is a good one and as presented, <br />gives adequate safeguards; and that <br />the City staff has come up with an <br />imaginative way to solve some very <br />serious problems. <br />Commissioner Doherty emphasized that <br />the important thing here is that <br />citizens did make their feelings kno <br />and efforts were made to solve those <br />concerns. At this point, he would <br />be prepared to accept the plan. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.