Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />a Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DCtB November 12, 1975 <br />Time : s:os P.M. <br />Pio ce: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Regarding the Marshall Perry appeal on the <br />denial for his sign acted on by the Design <br />Review Board at the October meeting, Commis- <br />sioner Garrigan wished to emphasize that <br />the sign was illegal to begin with. Now, he <br />is appealing his turndown. He wanted Counci <br />to be cognizant that, so far, Mr. Perry had <br />refused to remove the illegal sign. <br />Commissioner Doherty suggested that the City <br />might want to solicit donations of trees froi <br />the Val Vista area residents for their park. <br />Mr. Sooby replied that this is already being <br />done, that there is approximately $200.00 se <br />aside to buy trees. <br />Commissioner Doherty stated that apparently <br />Alameda County may locate their new adminis- <br />trative offices in town. If this should <br />occur, the Planning Commission would want to <br />have the opportunity to review their design <br />plans. <br />It was requested that this message be relaye <br />to the County via the City Council. <br />Commissioner Doherty brought up the matter <br />relating to Commission approval, earlier in <br />the year, fora conditional use permit for <br />a Mr. Denevi to establish an indoor-tennis <br />complex in the former Reynold Johnson <br />facility. Apparently, Alameda County Fair- <br />grounds now plans to also establish some <br />indoor tennis courts and have approached the <br />City's Park and Recreation Department to <br />request them to operate the facility. Some <br />possibility of related services such as <br />a pro shop, cafeteria or restaurant, baby- <br />sitting services, etc., were also considered <br />He wondered if such a facility would not <br />be an infringement upon private enterprise. <br />-7- <br />