PC 01/27/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

City. He said you can't have a street through a swimming pool. He then said people in the area are pretty well satisfied with one acre or more and would like to have the rest of the area developed in that way. Commissioner Wilson said that the Planning Commission has asked staff to come back with a report on the area and they have done so by virtue of Item 7b on the agenda. Commissioner Jamieson brought up the prezoning of the area. Mr. Harris stated that LAFCO requires prezoning of the property at the time they approve an annexation into the City. Commissioner Wilson said we are amending the General Plan land use designation on the property and not prezoning anything right now. He said presently the General Plan land use designation on the pro- perties is Medium Density and since other parcels will be coming into the City, the Planning Commission wanted to find out what everyone wanted out there. He said no one is asking other property owners to join the application. Commissioner Doherty said this matter has been before the Planning Commission for some time. He said it is the Planning Commission's desire to change the General Plan prior to annexation and subse- quently bring in the zoning. He said it is rather unique but that PUD might be a good idea but that the General Plan is the item that needs to be addressed tonight. He said in fairness to all parties, if the Planning Commission feels sufficient information has been provided, they should move ahead on the General Plan prior to annexation. Commissioner Doherty asked Mr. Corley if he really felt multiple owners could get together and concur to put PUD zoning together. Mr. Corley said you don't need concurrence in zoning. Herb Singleton, 2207 Martin Avenue, spoke in favor of the annexa- tion and Low Density Residential land use designation. He said one acre concept would be wrong. He said the walnut orchard at the moment is not being kept up and it is no big thing. He said he is disturbed with Mr. Barbee's plan. He said it shows no appreciation for those already in the area. He said the engineers have to make sure there are City services, etc. He said he paid a $466 PG&E bill for electrical and that using a PUD or advance planning concept is a good one. Bob Cooper, 3711 Trenery Drive spoke in favor of Low Density Resi- dential zoning and is not interested in annexing. He said his PG&E electric bill was $180. Eugene Lauer, 2221 Martin Avenue (corner of Trenery) urged Low Density Residential. He said east of Oakland and south of the canal should be low density including the Thorpe property and supported statements made by others. -5- _--°T-.._...._.. ...