PC 02/10/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Planning Commission Minutes 2/10/82 Commissioner Jamieson spoke to Mr. Jones' concern wit:Z :20,000 sq. ft. lot zoning when he has a lot 17,000 sq. ft. Mr. Harris said that R-1-10,000 zoning would conform to the General Plan and didn't feel that it would make a great deal of difference whether it is zoned R-1-10,000 or R-1-20,000. Commissioner Wilson asked if 20,000 sq. ft. lots would be exempt under RAP. Mr. Harris responded that development will now be on a first-come, first-served basis. Commissioner Wilson asked what would happen under PUD zoning. Mr. Harris-said it would allow more flexibility but stated that the applicant did not request PUD zoning. Commissioner Wilson said the area should have a 'country-type' design to it. Commissioner Wilson then asked Mr. Jones to readdress the Commission. Mr. Jones said he originally asked for one-third acre lot size zoning but that the City doesn't have this zoning designation. He said 20,000 sq. ft. zoning is not objectionable except that if he dedicates a road to the City, he can't comply with the lot sizes and that he also has a lot of only 17,000 sq. ft. Commissioner Wilson then explained the PUD zoning to Mr. Jones. Discussion then ensued between Mr. Jones and Commissioner Wilson regarding the size of Rose Lane and related setbacks. Mr. Jones said the road goes back 130 feet to the Arroyo and then deadends. Commissioner Wilson asked staff if they would require Rose Lane be dedicated. Mr. Warnick responded that this would be preferred and that the road doesn't have to be 60 feet. He said it could be 30-32 feet curb-to-curb with parking on one side. Mr. Jones said there would be no houses facing either Rose Avenue nor Rose Lane. Mr. Warnick said that Rose Lane currently serves the other two parcels. Commissioner Jamieson addressed Mr. Jones' preference for zoning and stated Mr. Jones has been very patient with regard to the entire matter. He then asked Mr. Warnick. if a 30 foot setback. is needed. Mr. Warnick said it seems to him the area could support R-1-10,0.0.0 and suggested this or PUD zoning. Mr. Harris indicated that at this point perhaps the best thing would be to rezone the property PUD-Medium Density Residential and further would like to make sure the applicant understands that he would have to come in with a master plan for the area. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Jamieson, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey that the negative declaration prepared for Case RZ-$125 be recommended for approval inasmuch as approval of this application would have no significant adverse effect on the. environment. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairperson Getty None None None -3- _ , _ .. .... _ _..... .._._... , ..._. _ . _. _. _... _.._ __._ . --_.r_.. ..