PC 03/31/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Jamieson said he thought the motion would be in accord with what the Planning Commission previously agreed to. Chairperson Getty said at the previous Planning Commission meeting a game arcade (video) was considered. She said now is the time for the City to look at other areas and restrictions imposed by them. PUD-82-1, Reynolds and Brown Application of Reynolds and Brown for P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) development plan approval of a second phase of development for the 56 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Hopyard Road and I-580 in the vicinity of Bannister and Owens Drives. The proposed development plan proposes fourteen individual office and research and development buildings on the sites ranging from 1.2 to 7.2 acres in size with structures proposed up to five stories in height. Zoning for the property is P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) Industrial/ Commercial and Offices. The Planning Commission may recommend any action relative to the proposal consistent with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained that this matter was continued from the previous Planning Commission meeting and that since that time, the applicant Reynolds and Brown, and the Meyer people have resolved their conflict with regard to the scheduling of street development, payments, etc. and have entered into an agreement regarding these matters. The public hearing was opened. Tom Terrill, Reynolds and Brown addressed the Commission. He thanked Mr. Warnick and Mr. Swift for the help in the resolution of the concerns previously expressed. He stated that the development does conform to the conditions of the February 1981 PUD approval and that generally the traffic volume will be reduced because of the reduction in commercial activity. He said there will be no increase to density or design criteria. He stated he would be happy to answer any questions. Chairperson Getty expressed concern about R&D being next to a motel. She stated that the Meyer development also has this same situation. Mr. Terrill stated that this is simply schematic approval and the motel and R&D facilities would have to come back for design review approval. He stated that if a hotel actually happens, they will look carefully at the property. Chairperson Getty then asked Mr. Terrill about phasing. Mr. Terrill said they have had interest from corporate type of people with 20,000-40,000 sq. ft. office needs. Chairperson Getty asked if Reynolds and Brown could build a 5-story building within a 65 ft. height frame. Mr. Terrill stated he believed they could. Chairperson Getty, Commissioner Jamieson asked if there is a city-wide ordinance regulating height. Mr. Harris stated there is not but this restriction was placed on the Meyer development. Commissioner Wilson stated that there has been no consideration to allow for additional height to accommodate an elevator room. He stated that the 65 ft. limitation was put on because the "telesquirt" could handle 65 ft. Commissioner Jamieson stated he is in favor of three-story buildings only and could not support five-story buildings in town. -2- _.......T.. ..