PC 05/19/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

number 76 Commissioner Jamieson asked what would happen to the bike lane when it becomes a traffic lane. Mr. Warnick said it would be removed from the street and put onto the sidewalks. Commissioner Jamieson then asked about condition number 84, page 27, and what would happen after the first 10 years. Mr. Warnick explained. Mr. Warnick said it is proposed that the streets be slurry sealed every five years and they will last a long time. Commissioner Jamieson then addressed condition number 94 on page 28. Mr. Warnick stated that it relates to sewage plans ultimately to be approved by the City Council. Commissioner Jamieson asked about the legality of stopping the operation if it becomes necessary in the opinion of the City. Mr. Swift said you can condition the project to control pollutants if they exceed the EPA standards set. He said there is already oxidents in the air. He said you could have a general condition which would probably suffice and the actual implementation could be worked out. Chairperson Getty concurred with this and Commissioner Lindsey said that in the interim between the Planning Commission and City Council the staff could be working on the appropriate wording. Mr. Sullivan stated that the Commission is ignoring pollutants and particles emitted by diesel. Commissioner Jamieson said he agrees to this and said he would like to see a condition added. Chairperson Getty raised the question as to how one would know the proposed business park is the one causing the pollution. Commissioner Jamieson said that with this project importing 75,000 people we need something. Commissioner Wilson said the developer has sewerage to service 50 to 200 acres of the project if he is careful. He said he didn't see anything in the conditions with this regard. Mr. Harris stated there is a condition which says the City doesn't guarantee the availability of sewage to the developers. Chairperson Getty said she didn't believe that housing should be involved in the area and said condition number 3 should be eliminated. Commissioner Lindsey said he would support this statement. Commissioner Jamieson said he didn't necessarily concur as there are houses right across the street and this could be a safety valve. Commissioner Wilson said he would go along with the statements of Commissioners Getty and Lindsey with this regard. Commissioner Jamieson asked if there is enough land to make up for this. Mr. Harris explained the reason for this condition was in the event there was a ne=ed for housing in the area, it could be provided for. A motion was then made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Wilson that case PUD-81-30 be recommended for approval subject to the conditions shown in the staff report to the Commission dated 5/19/82 as this project conforms to the General Plan as recommended for change, with the following changes: -1.9- .._..._.. _._._ .. .___ _. _. .. __ T