Laserfiche WebLink
Condition No <br />Delete <br />Condition No. 4 <br />Eliminate last sentence. <br />Condition No. 5 <br />Items sub-paragraph M and N were omitted as uses. <br />Condition No. 62 <br />Add: Qualified citizen(s) to list of people who will establish <br />procedures for the storage and handling of hazardous materials. <br />105. That the developer must submit plans for any construction <br />in the LAVwPdA easement to LAVF7P~lA for approval. The design of <br />any work in the LAVWMA easement must be approved by the <br />LAVLdb~IA engineers. <br />106. That until such time as Hacienda Drive interchange is con- <br />structed, all truck traffic generated by the development, <br />including trucks used in construction activities, shall be <br />directed northward on internal tract streets to Gibraltar <br />Drive and, hence, northward on Hopyard Road to I-580 so <br />that no trucks shall use existing City streets other than <br />Hopyard Road north of Gibraltar; after the Hacienda Drive <br />interchange is constructed, all truck traffic shall be <br />directed to use solely internal tract streets and Hacienda <br />Drive interchange. The project's CC&Rs shall be amended <br />to include this restriction. <br />107. That until such time as the traffic assessment district(s) <br />has been formed and assessments levied on all properties, <br />no building permits will be issued. <br />108. That the City, at developer expense, shall hire a qualified <br />atmospheric scientist or air pollution expert to evaluate <br />project-generated air quality impacts, establish air <br />quality standards to minimize air quality impacts from the <br />project and ensure that state and federal standards for <br />primary pollutants are met at the site and along access <br />routes, and develop a monitoring program which can be used <br />to evaluate air quality impacts as the project develops. <br />In the event such standards would be exceeded by any incre- <br />mental development proposal, that particular project shall <br />not be approved. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairperson Getty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Doherty <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2174 was then entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of case PUD-81-30 as motioned. <br />ADJOURi~1MENT <br />There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:10 a.m. <br />Pray 20, 1982 by Chairperson Joyce Getty. <br />R spectf lly submitted, <br />~f t~ r~~,~Secretary <br /> <br />