My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/19/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 05/19/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:08 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:16:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/19/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Getty indicated that the developer is aware of those <br />problems and has met with the homeowners associations in these two <br />areas. Mr. Pearson said these problems have to be faced before City <br />Council acts on the project. <br />John Innes: Said that Callahan is in business to make money and has <br />spent much money on the business park. He said the EIR is the only <br />study done by City staff and, therefore, some of the others may <br />be biased. He believes that the impacts on the tri-valley area are <br />significant. He said there is construction going on in the Bishop <br />ranch area of San Ramon, Livermore Airport Park, etc. He said the <br />area east of Santa Rita Road is in the sphere of influence of the <br />City. He said the various studies take into account cities within <br />30 minutes and Orinda is at least 25 minutes away during a weekend <br />morning. He said if these types of errors are existing, what types <br />of errors exist regarding the internal street system and proposed <br />interchanges. He said housing is a problem and there is now a con- <br />flict of statements in the General Plan. He spoke to the 1992 <br />buildout. He said this could be a legal problem. He asked the <br />City's liability if the assessment districts are formed and the <br />developer doesn't finish building. He said this is not addressed <br />in any reports. He said he would like to see a Hacienda Business <br />Park in the town but it needs to be in balance with residential. <br />He said carte blanche approval should not be given to this large <br />project. He didn't want to see economics dictate densities. He <br />further asked if it was possible to have a change in procedure whereby <br />the public hearing would be open to the proposed General Plan changes <br />and Planned Unit Development at the same time since they directly <br />relate to one another. He said many people left early after speaking <br />on the General Plan. <br />Jack Hovingh proposed one entrance for the business park, that it <br />be mandatory that buses be used, that the developer sponsor a local <br />transportation system. <br />Pete Jacobson stated that trucks going down Hopyard Road when the <br />building project is taking place should use Johnson Drive and not <br />Hopyard Road. He said trucks will still come down Hopyard Road and <br />lights will be shining everywhere. Mr. Callahan said the light <br />fixtures will be moved away from the houses. Mr. Jacobson spoke to <br />noise and traffic concerns. He said there was an item on the ballot <br />in the past which was voted down regarding sewer, now there is <br />the LAVWMA pipeline. Chairperson Getty indicated she believed the <br />vote of the people included how large it would be. <br />Mr. Walker, City Manager, said the size of the pipeline was the issue <br />and that Livermore and Pleasanton were under a mandate to correct <br />their sewer problem. <br />Chairperson Getty indicated that there will be an acoustical study <br />which has not yet been completed which will give direction in solving <br />some of the noise problems. <br />-17- <br />_._.. .., ..._.... .. ....T... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.