PC 06/24/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Weimken asked what would happen if the seven property owners did sign the application and one of the properties were sold prior to development - does the proposal run with the land. Mr. Harris stated it does run with the land. Acting City Attorney Brian Swift stated PUD is nothing different than R-1-20 and that there is always the possibility that one half of a street can go on one lot and the other half on another. He reiterated that the staff would attempt to get a development plan under all seven parcels because it makes more sense to do so stating the City has the right of approval through Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Weimken said the matter of stubbing streets is apparent and would like to know exactly where they will stub them. Chairperson Lindsey indicated this is not an appropriate thing to consider at the zoning stage. Mr. Weimken indicated that according to his recollection at the City Council meeting they stated 20,000 sq. ft. was too small for the area. Mr. Harris stated that if this property is not prezoned it will automatically go into the Study District. He said the development plan when it is considered can be denied by the Planning Commission or City Council. Mr. Harris stated that the property owners have requested that the zoning not be five acre minimum zoning. Mr. Weimken indicated that the area is rural, people have horses and orchards and he would like the area preserved. Commissioner Jamieson asked why the Planning Commission couldn't prezone the property in five acre lots. Mr. Harris said the Planning Commission could recommend that if they so desired. Commissioner Jamieson then asked Commissioner Doherty how he feels about five acre lots. Commissioner Doherty said that it wouldn't be realistic and that he would recommend nothing smaller than 20,000 sq. ft. lots. Commissioner Getty indicated that PUD Low Density Residential would give the City more control. Commissioner Jamieson said if you limit it to 20,000 sq. ft., you can be sure people will come in with just that amount of area and nothing more. Mr. Wagerman clarified that there are seven property owners and they plan on coming in with a collective plan. He said drawing up plans is not cheap ($5,000-$10,000). He further said Mr. Weimken's property is not near the subject property of this application. Commissioner Wilson asked Mr. Wagerman how many lots he intends to get out of the 35 acres. Mr. Wagerman said that hasn't been deter- mined. He further said it is more prestigious to have one-half to acre lots for ranchettes than larger lots. He said the people will have to join together and get sewers. Commissioner Wilson then asked if Mr. Wagerman thought he could get seven people to agree with a development plan. Mr. Wagerman said he hoped to do just that. He said he has discussed the improvements with Art Dunkley of Castlewood Properties. He said further Weimken's property is 800' away from the closest parcel and he doesn't abut this property. -6- _. _ __~.