PC 07/28/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-82-13, Castlewood Properties, Inc. Application of Castlewood Properties, Inc. for Planned Unit Development zoning and development plan approval of an approximately 48 acre site for the development of 24 parcels for single-family residential use, located northwest of the intersection of Foothill Road and Bernal Avenue. The property is currently zoned HPD (Hillside Planned Develop- ment) District. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will also be considered. Mr. Harris reviewed the staff report and referred to letters received from Mr. Maurice Engel and Mr. Henderson who requested this matter be continued until the hillside planned development issue is settled. Letters received from Mr. Dunkley, Castlewood Properties, Inc. included a proposed revision to condition number 82, a supplementary document justifying the planned unit development in accordance with require- ments of the PUD ordinance to ascertain its conformity with the General Plan. Mr. Harris suggested the Commission decide whether they wanted to consider this matter at this time. Commissioner Jamieson asked for comments from the Assistant City Attorney. Mr. Swift stated it was up to the Commission whether they wish to continue the matter or not. He stated there is no requirement that they have to continue the matter until conclusion of the HPD process. Chairperson Lindsey stated this has been going on for more than a year and he felt it should be acted on at this time. Commissioner Getty stated she agreed. She further stated that although she did not know what would happen in regard to the HPD next week, she firmly believed that it was possible to have more control with PUD applications on some of the property and would like to hear this as a PUD case. Commissioner Doherty stated that although the proposed HPD ordinance will be discussed next week, there is a question in the minds of some as to whether this document is even needed and whether or not PUD's might not be sufficient. He further stated he did not feel this case should be continued. Mr. Henderson, 2870 Foothill Road, Pleasanton, stated he did not understand how the Commission could have a reasonable discussion of the matter as he did not feel they had enough time to evaluate the information. Chairperson Lindsey recommended the case be heard as planned. Commissioner Getty asked Mr. Harris about the logic of condition number 1 to the staff report. -14- .. ...___..... __ _ _T __