Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGtB : February 4, 1976 <br />Time ; 8:00 P.M. <br />PIOC@; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Commissioner Butler stressed the im- <br />portance of completion of the City's <br />streets, since this was probably the <br />most pressing, and certainly the most <br />expensive. <br />Commissioner Garrigan brought up <br />several points pertaining to the Plan <br />Map. As he recalled, completion of <br />the frontage road south of I-580 may <br />not become a reality because of the ~ <br />railroad and there could not be a <br />grade crossing, necessitating either <br />an overpass or underpass instead. Mr <br />Sooby indicated no recollection of <br />this. Commissioner Garrigan then <br />referred to the reduction of general <br />plan map land use categories and how <br />it would affect the industrial area <br />north of Mohr Avenue. He recalled <br />that residential and school develop- <br />ment abutted industrial park zoning <br />on one side and office area on the <br />other side. Mr. Harris verified that <br />the zoning will remain as Industrial ~, <br />Park. Commissioner Garrigan also <br />emphasized the importance of completi~ <br />the City's circulation system. <br />Commissioner Shepherd verified from <br />Mr. Harris that from the previous <br />..hearing, the Commission had estab- <br />'llished that they did not want to be <br />'pitied to a specific growth percentage <br />Irate, but that with the flexibility <br />of the benchmarks divided into 10- <br />~~,year growth increments and averaged <br />lat 2~ per year, they could accomplish <br />the job. <br />.Regarding Policy Statement #2, Goal <br />4, Housing: Commissioner Shepherd <br />',wished to know whether this was just <br />a general statement of intent or some• <br />-9- <br />