My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/11/76
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
PC 02/11/76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:17:19 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:35:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/11/1976
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/11/76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4~~~$"fir°y CITY of PLEA~ANT~~J <br />~~ •~~. ~ ~ <br />.~ <br />~° Planning Commission <br />wrao t <br />I MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DctB : February 11, 1976 <br />Time : a:oo P.M. <br />PIQCB; Pleasanton Justice Court <br /> area. Commissioner Shepherd reiter- <br /> ated Commissioner Garrigan's com- <br /> ments. He did not wish to see com- <br /> mercial taken away from the central <br /> business district. <br /> Commissioner Doherty expressed con- <br /> cern for any uses which may occur <br /> on land west of this property. He <br /> felt it was incumbent to scrutinize <br /> those uses from a compatibility <br /> standpoint. <br /> A resolution was then entered and <br /> adopted recommending to the City <br /> Council the approval of RZ-76-1, <br /> as petitioned. <br />CONDITIONAL USE New Life Fellowship Church - appli- <br />PERMIT cation for a conditional use permit <br />UP- 6- , Approved, to construct and operate a church <br />Res. 1395. and related facilities on an approxi <br /> mately 4.05 acre site located on the <br /> southwest corner of Hopyard Road <br /> and Valley Trails Drive (South). <br /> Zoning for the property is RM-15 <br /> (Multiple Residential) District. <br /> Secretary Harris stated that churche <br /> are a conditionally allowed use in <br /> the R Districts, hence this appli- <br /> cation. Previously, a mortuary <br /> was proposed for this property <br /> but was turned down. At the time <br /> that Council denied the request for <br /> establishment of a mortuary at this <br /> location, they requested that plan- <br /> ning staff review the site to con- <br /> sider zoning it to lower density <br /> residential. Although this matter <br /> was discussed with the property <br /> owner, due to the press of other <br /> matters of higher priority, the <br /> study of this site has not been <br /> carried out. <br />tesolution• <br />seconded: <br />dyes <br />Toes <br />absent <br />abstain <br />X <br />X <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.