My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/11/76
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
PC 08/11/76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:15:49 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:24:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/11/1976
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/11/76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />o Planning Commission <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : August 11, 1976 <br />Time : s : oo P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Council Chambers <br />land surrounding the hospital site, <br />Mr. Bras felt that in the three years <br />approximately, it would take to com- <br />plete building the hospital, they wou d <br />hope to have doctors offices complete <br />as well. He did not feel that staff' <br />recommendations would hinder them if <br />everyone is speaking the same languag . <br />Next, applicant's counsel, Steve <br />Hallgrimson, spoke. He discussed the <br />alternatives and ramifications of a <br />planned unit development. He felt <br />that the last two conditions on the <br />list presented at the hearing that <br />evening would not be too advantageous <br />He requested that it not be part of <br />the proceedings. He wished to discus <br />them with the Deputy City Attorney. <br />.Regarding Condition No. 3, he felt <br />ithat with an adequate planned unit <br />'development ordinance the condition <br />I~could be handled. <br />Commissioner Jamieson felt that the <br />doctors offices should not occur prio <br />to the hospital. <br />In summary, Mr. Braden stated that <br />they would want Conditions 2 and 3 <br />deleted, and would prefer to have the <br />PUD "overlay" staff recommended de- <br />leted. <br />Objections were raised by: <br />Alan Grossman, legal counsel for Dr. <br />Schlies (owner of building further <br />south on the east side of Santa Rita <br />Road). Mr. Grossman is a resident of <br />Pleasanton. He stated that this fac- <br />ility presently has over 14,000 squar <br />feet of vacant office space. He won- <br />dered how the project would operate i <br />they had to go in without sewer capac - <br />ty and had to operate on holding tank . <br />-3- <br />iI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.