PC 10/13/76 - Laserfiche WebLink

Dan Pons, 4242 Vervais Avenue, indicated that the original conditions attached to City Council approval have not been adhered to. He remains opposed to access being granted for Vervais Avenue. Mr. Amaral, attorney for Dan Pons and George Garibaldi, expressed concerns about installing a sound deadening barrier. Also, would hours be expanded to include Saturday work hours? It was Commissioner Shepherd's position that all of the Commissioners' concerns have been adequately covered with the listing of conditions in the October 13 staff report. Commissioner Jamieson wished to add into Condition 6 that the instal- lation of the proposed filtration equipment be concurrent with the access being utilized from Vervais Avenue. Resolution 1452 was then entered by Commissioner Shepherd approving the applicant's request subject to the conditions one through seven plus 8, 9 and 10, with the modifications previously discussed to Condition No. 6. This resolution was seconded by Commissioner Doherty, and carried, with Commissioner Jamieson dissenting and Commissioner Wood absent. Chairman Butler stated that the concerns expressed by ~Ir. Amaral f+c~r his clients are very valid and if there are complaints made to City Hall, the applicant should be made aware of these complaints and rectify the problem. Roll Ca11 Vote Resolution: Commissioner Shepherd Seconded: Commissioner Doherty Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Shepherd and Chairman Butler Noes: Commissioner Jamieson Absent: Commissioner Wood Abstain: None ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RZ-76-5, Planning Commission - a 14 (PUD Planned Unit Development the Ordinance Code of the City o Article in its entirety. lication for a revision to Article istrict), Chapter 2, Title II of Pleasanton which would amend the City Attorney, Ken Scheidig, was present to explain the draft ordinance to the Commissioners. The purpose of the ordinance amendment is to: 1 - Separate the zoning process from the subdivision process; 2 - Separate the zoning process from the development process; 3 - Impart greater flexibility to the PUD process; 4 - Simplify the process and remove confusing and conflicting requirements; 5 - Delete development schedule requirements. The Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Woody Pereira, Morrison Homes, indicated he felt the draft ordinance did clarify many items. He felt the manner in which it is implemented would dictate its effectiveness. The Public Hearing was closed. Resolution 1453 recommending to the City Council the adoption of revision of Article 14 (Planned Unit Development) in its entirety, was entered and adopted by all present. -2 -.