PC 10/13/76 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Pleasanton Council Chambers 30 West Angela Street October 13, 1976 8:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - PLEDGE TO THE FLAG Chairman Butler called the meeting to order at 9:05 P.M. and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL The Roll Call Votetiaas us follows: Present; Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Shepherd, and Chairman Butler. Absent; Commissioner Wood. Staff members present were Bob Harris, Don Sooby, Harvey Levine, Ken Scheidig and Recording Secretary Yvonne McFadden. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of September 8, 1976 meeting were approved as submitted. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Item 6d - RZ-76-15, Morrison Homes Secretary Harris indicated that the item would need to be continued to next regularly schedule meeting on November 10, 1976, pending resolution of the question whether it would be a valid application at this time in light of the denial by City Council. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION AND CONDITIONAL Z-76-120,~UP-76-19, Pleasanton Body Shop - modification to allow egress on to Vervais use permit for the egress for Pleasanton B~ Stanley Boulevard; zoning for the property District. USE PERMIT application for design review Avenue; and a conditional ~dy Shop located at 4262 is C-S (Commercial Service) Secretary Harris reiterated the background of this case. On July 14, 1976, the Planning Commission advised the staff of the conditions which they would like to see included in any kind of approval for these ap- plications. These conditions were drafted up and reviewed by all con- cerned parties. This new information is incorporated in the staff report dated October 13. The proponent has advised that the first sentence of Condition 6 is not acceptable and asked that it be deleted.. To replace that wording, staff is recommending addtLOn o~ Condition 8r plus two other conditions - 9 and 10. Additionally, Chairman Butler indicated that Condition No. 6 should be modified to indicate (exhaust) system for the "filtration" system noted in the staff report. Commissioner Jamieson wondered how the question of noise control, as stated in Condition 8, could be handled or controlled. Some discussion ensued regarding various decibt~l levels, but it was pointed out that at this time, the City had no budget to purchase such equipment. Mr. Bill Hirst, attorney for the applicants, stated that while they feel the conditions are difficult to abide by, they feel they can agree with the most recent staff report. Upon questioning by Chairman Butler, Mr. Hirst indicated that his clients are taking steps to allay the noise complaints registered by nearby residents. He spoke about a new noise alleviating air chisel his clients will be employing. Additionally, his clients will be dedicating a 10 ft. strip on Vervais Avenue to relocate telephone poles. Commissioner Jamieson wished to know whether the filtration system would be installed concurrently with the installation of the gate on Vervais Avenue and Mr. Hirst answered yes.