My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/08/76
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
PC 12/08/76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:15:05 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:12:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/1976
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/08/76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Roll Call Vote <br />Resolution: Shepherd <br />Seconded: Doherty <br />Ayes: Doherty, Jamieson, <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Shepherd, Wood, Chairman Butler <br />Assistant City Manager Alan Campbell joined the meeting at 9:30 P.M. <br />Review of property owned by H. C. Elliott, bounded by Pico Avenue, Tawny <br />Way, Palomino and backing to apartments on Norton Way, with the intent to <br />place it into the Planned Unit Development District. <br />Secretary Harris indicated that when this matter was reviewed by the City <br />Council, the consensus of opinion was that this property should be zoned <br />Planned Unit Development. Accordingly, it was being returned to the <br />Planning Commission for review and a report back on the matter. Mr. Harry <br />Elliott, Jr., was present and stated that he felt the controls imposed <br />by the commercial and multiple districts would be sufficient to guarantee <br />proper development of the properties, with the single exception that the <br />City Council wished to see development of the commercial lands before the <br />multiples. He does not feel the City Council understands the priorities <br />his company may have. His main objection to the zoning proposed by the <br />City Council is that in essence, they would be starting from zero. He <br />would rather not have the property zoned P.U.D. He indicated that they <br />were hoping to begin work on the commercial center sometime next summer. <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked if they now have an anchor tenant secured, <br />and Mr. Elliott indicated they have a developer who is working with an <br />anchor tenant. It is their intention to begin work the following summer <br />whether through a tenant or on their own. <br />It was the feeling of the Commissioners that their original recommendation <br />to the City Council should be reiterated. <br />A motion was then entered and adopted recommending to the City Council that <br />their original recommendation filed under Resolution 1454 dated October 13, <br />1976, that the property be rezoned to commercial neighborhood, and RM-4000 <br />with the maximum number of dwelling units which could be constructed on <br />it to be no greater than the maximum number of units which could be con- <br />structed in the residential portion of the subject property under its <br />present zoning. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Motion: Doherty <br />Seconded: Jamieson <br />Ayes: Doherty, Jamieson, <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Shepherd, Wood, Chairman Butler <br />-6- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.