My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/09/77
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
PC 11/09/77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:19:09 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 11:44:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/9/1977
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/09/77
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
potential environmental problems. A drat resolution had been prepared <br />by the City Attorneys office for the Commissions use. The resolution <br />was read aloud for the benefit of the persons in the audience. <br />The Public Hearing was opened on the environmental assessment portion. <br />Mr. Bob Bradford, Project Manager for LAVWMA, stood ready to answer any <br />questions. He stated that LAVWMA and its consultants are in agreement <br />with the tenor and intent of the staff report. <br />Commissioner Doherty expressed some concerns regarding safety, environ- <br />mental aesthetics and possible odor problems. He noted that these concerns <br />were covered under the draft resolution, and Condition #13 added to the <br />conditional use permit applications would take care of the odor problem. <br />He had a question regarding the project, such as, would the odor controls <br />imposed be done so as to be sufficiently effective; aesthetic-wise, he <br />felt that great care should be used in screening the structures from view; <br />also, he had concerns regarding possibility of earthquakes and their impact <br />on such a facility. Commissioner Jamieson shared these concerns. <br />Mr. Robert Harding, Project Director from the consulting firm of CH2M Hill, <br />indicated that the system is unlike the existing sewage treatment plants in <br />that it is an export system of treated effluent. The water in the ponds <br />would be secondary treated effluent. At the junction structure, both <br />Livermore and V.C.S.D. will be required by agreement with LAVWMA to main- <br />tain a chlorine residual of one part per million. This will be monitored <br />continually at the receiving end. The export pump station has capacity <br />to inject additional chlorine north of the junction structure and over <br />Boehmer Summit, including a wash down system of the regulating reservoirs. <br />Only one pond will be used at a time, the other being held in reserve. He <br />then explained how the wash down system would work. <br />He concluded his comments by stating that the proposal before them has <br />been determined to be the cost-effective means to resolve this long <br />standing problem. <br />In response to Commissions questions Mr. Harding noted: <br />The average amount of time the effluent would be in the reservoirs would <br />be less than 24 hours. <br />If there is a breakdown in the pump system, depending on when this happens, <br />the regulating reservoirs are sized and (based upon flow when the system <br />is connected, about 18 months from now) there would be about a one-day <br />reserve. There is a 1,000,000 gallon peaking pond in Livermore. There <br />is additional ponding capacity available at VCSD. If everything fails, <br />there will be discharge into the Alamo Canal and in that case, a report <br />would need to be filed with the Regional Board. <br />He also noted that the ponds would not be covered. Odor could be taken <br />care of through oxidation. The chlorine dosing apparatus will oxidize <br />this to the greatest part. Mr. Harding stated that the plans have <br />been reviewed by the Regional Board. <br />-2- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.