My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/12/78
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
PC 04/12/78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 9:20:35 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 11:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/12/1978
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/12/78
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regarding the design being proposed by Wickland Oil, Mr. Bras felt that <br />while it may be that Pleasanton is not accustomed to such architectural <br />styles, he feels its modern concept is still defensible. However, the <br />developer is open to negotiation on style and colors. <br />Then, Roy Wickland explained how the cashier's cage would operate. <br />He directed his comments then to the ingress driveway they hope to locate <br />on Hopyard Road. He felt that the traffic coming over the overpass would <br />decelerate as it descends into Pleasanton, thus would not cause traffic <br />congestion or accidents. <br />Lee Amaral, agreed that a mitigating negative declaration was necessary <br />but did not feel that the comments made under No. 12 - Energy Impacts - <br />is legitimate. <br />Next, John Mathews, 6789 Taffy Court, spoke in favor of the diesel pumps. <br />He owned a diesel fueled car once, and felt it would be an advantage to <br />be able to buy the gas in town instead of going to a truck stop. <br />The Public Hearing was closed. <br />Director of Engineering Services Don Sooby explained why he felt an access <br />from Hopyard Road would be unacceptable, for reasons of exceptionally heavy, <br />fast moving traffic. He stated that staff could not support this request. <br />Discussion centered on the future improvements on Hopyard Road and whether <br />some redesign there could be made to accommodate a driveway from Hopyard <br />Road to the station. Mr. Sooby continued to emphasize the undesirability <br />of such an access. <br />Commissioner Doherty indicated he was concerned about this problem, because <br />of the heavy traffic volume. <br />In answer to the possibility of narrowing the property to add a turn-off <br />lane, Mr. Roy Wickland indicated that the station could not be built if <br />this would be required. <br />Review of the negative declaration took place. <br />Commissioner Shepherd had no problem with truck service but had mixed feelings <br />about right-turn lane from Hopyard. <br />Commissioner Doherty felt the truck traffic would probably be minimal, and <br />supported provided diesel fuel for passenger vehicles. His main area of <br />concern remained with an access proposed for Hopyard Road. <br />Commissioner Jamieson also said he could not support an entry from Hopyard <br />Road. If diesel fuel will be made available to trucks, he worried that the <br />area could become a truck stop. And if the developers estimate that only <br />two trucks per hour will buy diesel, how profitable can it be for them. The <br />major question to be answered here is whether the location itself, given the <br />high traffic volume, is appropriate for a service station. <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.