PC 04/11/79 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 11, 1979 Commissioner Ken Geppert addressed Mr. Kameny concerning the five acres. He asked if the five acres were rezoned to medium density and if this project allowed, would the applicant be willing to increase the size of the lots to 8,500. Kameny stated yes, they would entertain that thought. Commissioner Geppert then made a motion to rezone the McManus property to R-1-8500 minimum. Commissioner Wilson seconded the motion. Mr. Kameny then again addressed the Commission stating he thought the discussion was concerning the rear lot and not the 61 acre parcel being considered. He stated that R-1-6500 with the ROD would accomplish this. Commissioner Doherty then made a motion to withdraw the motion of Geppert which was seconded by Commissioner Wilson. The Commission agreed unanimously to withdraw the motion. Commissioner Geppert then made a motion to rezone this property R-1-7500. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Getty. Resolution No. 1731 was then entered and adopted recommending R-1-7500 for RZ-79-04 to the City Council. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ayes Noes Abstain Commissioners Geppert, Getty & Chairman Jamieson Commissioners Doherty and Wilson None GP-79-05, Stoneson Application of Stoneson Development Co. for a general plan amendment to change the land uses designation of a 91.5 acre site located at the southwest intersection of I-580 and I-680 from "High Density Residential", "Public and Institutional" and "Parks and Recreation" to "Commercial and Office", "Public and Institutional", and "High Density Residential". The Planning Commission may designate any other land use category it deems appropriate or change any section of the General Plan necessary to maintain the internal consistency of the Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained the staff report and possible alternatives if a General Plan Amendment is adopted. He stated that if the conditions shown on the staff report are not considered in approval, an EIR would be necessary, otherwise the conditions mitigate any significant impacts outlined on the negative declaration. Commissioner Wilson stated that the percentages should be corrected by City Council relative to 25% multiple vs 75% single family housing as a General Plan goal to more accurately reflect what is going on. Public hearing was opened. Jo e Burkhardt representing the applicant spoke. He addressed public improvements designed to carry traffic by the regional facility. He stated the proposal doesn't intend to totally eliminate High Density Residential -- part of the land would be reserved for that use. He stated a major medical facility would be very compatible with a regional shopping center and so would housing for the elderly. He stated flexability is necessary. He stated traffic studies can be made as part of the special development plan for any individual segment of the plan. Commissioner Wilson asked how many employees were anticipated with regard to the Stoneridge Shopping Center. Burkhardt stated there would be between 2500-3000 employment opportunities. Commissioner Wilson then addressed the number of employees who might move into the area. Burkhardt stated he couldn't say how many would be moving to the area, how many are already in the area, nor could. he state the salary range or income of potential employees. He stated many would be part time and these circumstances would fluctuate. In answer to Commissioner Wilson's question, Mr. Burkhardt stated there would be 110-130 satellite stores. -6-