PC 03/14/79 - Laserfiche WebLink

A motion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner Geppert that the project filed under GP-79-7 be approved. Resolution No. 1722 was then entered recommending approval to City Council. Roll Call Vote Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Noes: Commissioner Wilson Absent: None Abstain: None Geppert, Getty and Chairman Jamieson Chairman Jamieson stated he wanted the Mackay General Plan Amendment for 6.6 acre site heard in June, 1979. PUD-79-1, Centex Homes Application of Centex Homes for a Planned Unit Development for a 116 unit, single-family detached residential complex to be located on a 32.4 acre site located between the Pleasanton School upper play field and Mirador Drive and immediately southerly of the residences bordering Angela Street. The site is presently zoned A (Agricultural) District. A negative declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. Mr. Harris stated the applicant has requested this matter be continued to 8:00 P.M. April 11, 1979 in order to better prepare their proposal. As no one objected, this item was continued until that time. PUD-78-1, Longview Application of L & H Land Company for approval of a hillside planned development consisting of a 10-lot, single-family residential subdivision located on a 50-acre site northwesterly of the existing terminus of Long- view Drive. The site is zoned HPD (Hillside Planned Development) District. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was also considered. Mr. Harris explained that this was continued from the last Planning Com- mission meeting with concurrence of the applicant to allow the staff and Commission to consider the information submitted by the applicant at that meeting. Mr. Harris stated that the material furnished by Gilbert Maines, the applicant's attorney, was sent to Moore and Tabor, EIR con- sultants for examination and determination as to whether that information caused them to change their opinion regarding slope stability and the existence of a block slide on the site. He .stated the .report came back from Moore & Tabor that there was nothing in the Gribaldo et al report that would make them change their opinion. Mr. Harris stated that the staff feels all information should be reviewed by another geological consultant. This person could be appointed by the geologists who prepared the previous reports. He asked that if the Planning Commission chooses to recommend approval, they do so conditioned upon the four conditions in the staff report. Commissioner Doherty again expressed concern with regard to fire hazards. Joe Hill, Fire Chief, addressed fire protection, summarizing his recom~ mendation stating this development raises serious concerns. He spoke to ingress and egress, water availability, intrusion of people. If this -6- . ~.... __._ . ..._. ._....__..-..T........... .. _. _... ___.____. _... __._ _ .. .