My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/08/79
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
PC 08/08/79
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 9:25:15 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 10:21:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/8/1979
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/08/79
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Allen spoke. He is on the BART Board and commended Commissioner Wilson for his <br />past service to this Board. He stated BART wouldn't be in this area at least until <br />1985 because the freeway would not be widened through Castro Valley until that time. <br />He stated the red line as shown on the map represents a better area than previously shown. <br />Bob Claypool, 6877 Hillsboro, spoke. He stated that in his opinion Taubman was asking <br />for a rezoning and not the realignment of BART and asked for assurance that the alternate <br />route is agreeable to the staff and BART. <br />Chairman Doherty explained. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Getty addressed the possibility of an eight-story office building. <br />Mr. Harris explained there were no height limitations in the C-R District but that the <br />matter would have to come before the Design Review Board. <br />Commissioner Jamieson addressed the Mitigated Negative Declaration concerning 4~8, <br />Noise. Mr. Harris stated that if there was a subway there would not be a significant <br />adverse impact on the environment. Commissioner Wilson stated the City is giving up a lot <br />but that BART doesn't have the money now to purchase the site and a compromise must <br />be made. Commissioner Getty addressed the location of the proposed Foothill reservoir. <br />Mr. Schaumburg indicated its location on the General Plan. Commissioner Jamieson inquired <br />as to who would be paying for the reservoir and Mr. Schaumburg explained. He stated that <br />this reservoir was not planned exclusively for Stoneridge but that the latter had to be <br />considered in determining the size of the water storage facility. Mr. Schaumburg stated <br />the tank would hold three million gallons. Commissioner Wilson made a motion which was <br />seconded by CommissionerJamieson that there would be significant adverse effects on <br />the environment but that they could be mitigated to an insigificant level with conditions <br />imposed on the project. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Commissioners Geppert, Getty, Jamieson, Wilson <br />and Chairman Doherty <br />None <br />Resolution No. 1784 was then entered and adopted approving the mitigated negative <br />declaration for GP-79-15. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Geppert that GP-79-15 <br />be recommended for approval subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Commissioners Geppert, Getty, Jamieson, Wilson <br />and Chairman Doherty <br />None <br />Resolution No. 1785 was then entered and adopted recommending approval of GP-79-15. <br />A brief discussion ensued concerning a possible subway between the Commissioners and staff. <br />RZ-79-15, Planning Commission <br />Application of the Planning Commission to rezone a roughly 95 acre area located east <br />of the developed portion of the Fairlands area (bounded generally by I-580 on the north, <br />the City limits on the east, the Arroyo Mocho on the south, and existing development <br />on the west) from the R-1-6500 (Single Family Residential-6,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size) <br />r.__. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.