PC 10/10/79 - Laserfiche WebLink

Planning Commission October 10, 1979 Page 3 opposition to this project and spoke to traffic concerns and asked that a definite decision not be made concerning this project. Chairman Doherty told Mr. Keeney that a definite decision would be made at this hearing but that decision could be appealed to the City Council. Chairman Doherty asked Mr. Campbell to address traffic going through Fairlands concerning this project. Mr. Campbell explained. The public hearing was again closed. Commissioner Wilson stated that the traffic study showed a traffic level of "A". He then made a motion that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and, thus, the negative declaration prepared for this project be approved. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Jamieson. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes Commissioner Jamieson, Wilson and Chairman Doherty Noes Commissioner Getty Absent Commissioner Geppert Resolution No. 1799 was then entered and adopted approving the negative declaration for UP-79-14. Commissioner Wilson then made a motion to approve UP-79-14 as petitioned subject to the conditions of the staff report of October 10, 1979 because all of the required findings enumerated A through C of the above staff report could be made. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Jamieson. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes Noes Absent Commissioners Jamieson, Wilson and Chairman Doherty Commissioner Getty Commissioner Geppert Resolution No. 1800 was then entered and adopted approving UP-79-14. RZ-79-15, Planning Commission Application to rezone a roughly 95 acre area located east of the developed portion of the Fairlands area (bounded generally by I-580 on the north, the City limits on the east, the Arroyo Mocho on the south and existing development on the west) from the R-1-6500 District to the R-1-10,000 District or any other zoning district consistent with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained the staff report and stated this matter was continued from the August Planning Commission Meeting at Mr. George Oakes request. Commissioner Wilson then inquired as to whether or not this proposal would include the school site as well as Tract 3148. George Oakes, the property owner stated that Tract 3148 is 57 units with a 9 acre school site. Mr. Oakes, in response to Mr. Wilson's request indicated on the map the location of the school site. The Commission reviewed and discussed the map. Mr. Harris stated that Tract 3148 is a final map and inquired if the 27 acres on Tract 3133 is final. Mr. Oakes responded that it was not a final map and that in those days the City Council revised the plans and would not approve final maps because of Indian problems in the area. Mr. Harris addressed Tract 3148 and the school site as being Lot #1 and that the property could be changed to R-1-8500 and/or R-1-10,000 and could fall within the street plan as well -3-