PC 12/11/79 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commiss:.ioner Leppert then took issue where Mr. Jotten spoke to addi- tional police and fire protection. Mr. Jotten then addressed page 48 of the EIR. Mr. Harris stated that Volume II of the EIR speaks to residential use. Mr. Jotten stated he did not agree with that. Robert M. Pearson, 3590 Churchill Court, Pleasanton - Mr. Pearson addressed comment #3, page 6-4 of the EIR concerning sewage require- ments for the project. He stated he did not agree with the figures and took issue with the method by which they were derived. Iie stated that dry weather flow must be used and not the flow at the time the report is made as it is low in the winter and high in the summer because people are watering more and using more facilities during the summer months. He further stated that in comparing a 1975 report which he has in his files to current data it indicates we have had no increases in sewage commitments. He addressed a City commitment to Kaiser and the Fairgrounds against the total proposed capacity. Commission Geppert then asked Mr. Pearson what the usage should be for this project. Mr. Pearson stated that there is a maximum of 120,000 gallons remaining which are not spoken for and that if the City doesn't come out right they are in for more lawsuits like that of 1972. Commissioner Wilson then asked Mr. Pearson what position he took with regard to the LAWVMA pipeline. Mr. Pearson responded that his position was negative on the entire project. John P. Corley, 3744 Trenery Drive, attorney for Utility Vault - Mr. Corley stated they are in favor of the plan as originally proposed for an industrial park. He stated Utility Vault is heavy industry and would not be compatible with a new residential complex. He stated Utility Vault manufactures concrete products for PG&E et al, has 75 employees with two shifts which finish at midnight and the business operates 5 days per week. He stated that by allowing residential into this area Utility Vault would be put in a position whereby it would be just a matter of time before the residents would be complaining about noise and that this has happened in other areas. Commissioner Geppert asked Mr. Corley when representing Utility Vault had he ever participated in discussions with Kaiser concerning El Charro Road. Mr. Corley stated that a railroad track divides them, that they only have about 10-20 trips per day and that they are not a massive user of Valley Avenue or Santa Rita Road, but that there was never any definitive discussions between Utility Vault and Kaiser. Ken Best, 2350 Royal Oaks - He stated he has a business in Union City where homes moved in next to the business and within a short period of time they were complaining about the noise. He stated he is in favor of an industrial park. Larry Osborne, 1159 Kottinger, representing the Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce - He stated his committee unanimously approved the first plan of Caroline's which was submitted. Eie stated it did have -4- e.. _ .~.__._....... _~ _ ... _. _ ..._ _..__ .__ _..__..___~_.____... - _. ., _ __ _. _.. __.. _.. ___ . __.. ... .... _. _ ._ _ . _..,..