PC 06/11/80 - Laserfiche WebLink

Tentative Tract 4611, Mission Park Application of Mission Park Investors for tentative map approval to subdivide a 54 acre parcel of land into 105 lots on their property located easterly of Sunol Boulevard between Mission Drive and Pico Avenue. The property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) District. Mr. Harris explained the staff report and stated this project conforms with PUD-77-10. Commissioner Getty asked that when this item was pre- viously before the Planning Commission she had concern with "A" Street parallel to Sunol Boulevard. Mr. Harris stated yes, there was some concern. Mr. Harris stated that the City Council set forth the conditions on this matter. Ted Fairfield, P. O. Box 1048, Pleasanton, spoke representing Blackwell Homes and, Mission Park Investors both of whom were in the audience. He stated that MacKay and Somps was also in the audience. Mr. Fairfield requested clarification of conditions number two and three of the staff report dated 6/11/80 and wanted to show that these conditions do not remove or reduce conditions of the annexation agreement and do not reduce any presently existing rights. Mr. Harris confirmed that these two conditions do not take away any existing rights granted. Mr. Fairfield stated he has no problems with the Engineering report but would like a 13th condition added: "That the Pico Avenue improvements as shown on the map are greater than provided by the annexation agreement so as a swap, no sidewalk will be required on Mission Hill side of Pico Avenue." Commissioner Jamieson asked if the applicant was happy with the division of streets as far as Centex is concerned and asked if it has been estab- lished yet. Mr. Fairfield stated MacKay and Somps has prepared the plan line and the plan line has been accepted by the City and School District. He stated based on this, Centex, School and the City are working to that plan line. As to who will build first, Mr. Fairfield stated he did not know. Commissioner Jamieson spoke to the name "Mission Hill".~ He wondered whether or not this would cause any confusion. Mr. Fairfield said there should not be any confusion as long as the street names aren't confusing. Mr. Fairfield stated they have complied with every condition placed upon the PUD. Frank Auf der Maur, 594 Pico Avenue, stated he lives next to the east side of that tract. He stated he lives on the top of a hill and the two lots below his house are 14' below his ground level. He stated he would appreciate consideration be given so that the two houses below his lot would be one-story so that his view wouldn't be eliminated. Chairperson Wilson asked how far away Mr. Auf der Maur's house was from the project. Mr. Auf der Maur responded it was about 25-30' from the property line. P•Zr. Auf der Maur pointed out his house on the map to the Commissioners. ~,Sr. Fairfield stated the lots in question are numbers 35 and 36 and that the conditions of the PUD pretty well establish split level lots. He stated they are willing to accept one one-story unit on the high side but need one and one-half stories on the low side. -7-