PC 09/10/80 - Laserfiche WebLink

GP-80-5, City Council Application of the City Council for a general plan amendment to change the land use designation of 18 separate sites and to change the Circulation Element to show an extension of Railroad Avenue. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Commissioner Joyce Getty opened discussion saying that the Land Use Committee worked on these changes for six months, inviting the public, through the newspapers to attend these work sessions and to submit input. She stated the Committee was made up of homeowners and others interested in the land use changes. She stated all concerns presented were addressed. Chairperson Wilson stated that if the Commissioners had no objections, the public hearing would be opened on each of the issues and after receiving testimony and comments, the public hearings would be closed, and at the conclusion the Planning Commission would make their recommendations. Mr. Harris stated he had some extra maps of the proposals and passed them out to the audience for their perusal during the course of the hearings. Item 1: Mr. Harris presented information concerning this property. The public hearing was opened. Roger Manning, 1078 Vintner Way, stated they have planned 16 one-half acre sites on this property and urged low density residential for the site as they have 16 sewer permits. Commissioner Getty asked Mr. Manning if they are ready to proceed and Mr. Manning stated they are ready. The public hearing was closed. Item 2: Mr. Harris explained this was once used for sewage disposal by the United States Army and now is used for sludge disposal by DS RS D. He stated this is a technical change and doesn't effect the land use of the area. The public hearing was opened. No one spoke, either on behalf of, nor against this proposal. The public hearing was closed. Item 3: Mr. Harris explained this would be a technical change on the map and makes no land use change. The public hearing was opened. No one spoke either on behalf of, nor against this proposal. -7- _. ..., .,.....,. _... _._."._....... .... _.~, _.. .. _.. _.__... _. _..,_ __.. __.. _. .. .,, ..... ._ _.._ T. _.. .._ .. ....