PC 01/14/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Jean Pappas, 3917 Fairlands Drive, stated she was of the understanding this property was zoned residential and objected to commercial uses. She asked how a person would go about changing the zoning designation. She further stated that no bike path has been constructed since McDonald's has located in the area. Mr. Warnick explained the mechanics involved. Chairperson Wilson stated that this property has been zoned C-F for at least eight years and only a general plan amendment and subsequent rezoning would change the land use designation. Ms. Papas said that the commercial use would endanger children in the area and Mr. Harris explained that the proposed zoning is a better use for the area than those allowed in the C-F District. Gloria Briggs, 3655 Camelot Court also spoke in opposition to this application with concerns of additional traffic, noise and reduction of property values. Chairperson Wilson stated that this is a two-way sword, i.e., when the owners of the property purchased the property they did so because it was so designated and the homeowners purchase their property believing it was something else. William Kovak, 3124 Weymouth Court, addressed the Commission neither speaking in favor nor opposition to this project. Mr. Bras readdressed the Commission stating they are aware of the concerns of the homeowners and intend to preserve the greenbelt even though it is not a recorded easement. He addressed the concerns of the surrounding neighbors present at the meeting. Commissioner Doherty spoke to access onto Brockton. He stated he would be in favor of eliminating the driveway on Brockton, otherwise it would force Pleasanton Meadows to be traversed by other persons. Chairperson Wilson asked Mr. Warnick to address this matter. Mr. Warnick stated it is difficult to know what to do without first knowing the uses. He stated condition number 2 could be changed to include "or prohibited." Mr. Harris stated it is difficult to discuss access until development plans have been brought in. A motion was made by Commissioner Jamieson, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey, that the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-80-15 be recommended for approval because approval of this project would have no significant adverse environmental effects on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Chairperson Wilson Noes: None Getty, Jamieson, Lindsey and Resolution No. 1937 was then entered and adopted recommending approval of the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-80-15. -14- __. _.._ _.._ w _. ~__ _ ~. _...._,_ . _ _ ____ .~ __ .....___ . _.._.___ ...__ ,..__ _____.__.. .